By Kokpar B. Wohwoh/ Philadelphia, USA
I strongly object to the politically motivated visits and public exposure of Chief Zanzan Karwor’s hospital bed by Representative J. Clarence T
Banks of District # 2 of Grand Bassa County and Mulbah Morlu, former Chairman of the Congress of Democratic Change of of President George Weah.
Their actions disregard moral principles and compromise Chief Zanzan Karwor’s health rights and human dignity.
I was dismayed by Mulbah’s discussion of Chief Kawa’s health status, which was a clear breach of his privacy. Chief Zanzan Karwor’s comments raise concerns about his well-being and suggest potential undue influence.
The clinic’s administration appears to prioritize politics over patient care, which is troubling. Mulbah’s criticism of John F. Kennedy Hospital is irresponsible and seems driven by political gain.
The actions of Representatives J. Clearence T. Banks and Mulbah Morlu , as well as the clinic’s administration, represent a profound breach of trust and a violation of Chief Zanzan Karwor, former head of Liberia’s traditional leaders, fundamental human rights.
A patient’s health information is sacrosanct, and its disclosure without consent is a betrayal of the trust that underpins the healthcare system. In the public sphere, individuals have a right to privacy, especially in vulnerable states. Discussing a patient’s condition for political gain reduces them to a pawn, stripping them of dignity.
This incident underscores the need for accountability and robust protections for patient confidentiality.
Recommendations
Representatives Banks and Mulbah Morlu should face censure for violating patient confidentiality and exploiting a vulnerable individual for political gain. The clinic’s administration should review and revise policies to prioritize patient privacy and dignity. Disciplinary action should be taken against staff involved in the incident.
An independent investigation should be conducted into the circumstances surrounding the incident to ensure accountability and prevent future breaches.
Philosophically, this incident highlights the tension between public interest and individual privacy. While public figures may invite scrutiny, their health information remains private unless explicitly waived.
The actions of Bank and Morlu demonstrate a utilitarian calculus that prioritizes political gain over individual rights – a morally bankrupt approach that undermines the principles of dignity and autonomy.
