The Liberian Government’s Warning To Protesters!

PHOTO: The Author

By Kokpar B. Wohwoh

Liberian/Philadelphia, USA

The government’s warning to protesters is a multifaceted issue, sparking debate about the delicate balance between maintaining public order and protecting citizens’ fundamental right to peaceful assembly. In Liberia, Article 17 of the constitution explicitly guarantees this right,

empowering citizens to express grievances and hold their government accountable.

This issue touched on the social contract theory posits that citizens surrender some freedoms in exchange for protection and services from the government. However, this contract also implies that the government must respect and protect citizens’ fundamental rights, including freedom of expression and assembly.

The utilitarian perspective suggests that the government’s warning might be justified if it prevents harm or ensures public safety. However, this approach raises questions about the proportionality of restrictions and the potential long-term consequences of limiting citizens’ rights.

In contrast, the libertarian viewpoint emphasizes individual liberty and autonomy, arguing that the government should prioritize protecting citizens’ rights to assemble and express themselves, as long as it doesn’t infringe on others’ rights.

In my worldview a balanced approach, is crucial and requires dimensional lense. This could involve designating specific protest areas, implementing robust security measures, and fostering open communication between the government and protesters to address grievances and prevent misunderstandings.

Ultimately, the key to resolving this issue lies in striking a balance between competing interests, respecting the constitution, and upholding democratic principles.

By doing so, the government can ensure that citizens’ voices are heard while maintaining public order and safety.