In The Charloe Musu Murder Case At The Criminal Court “A”
PHOTO: Former Chief Justice Gloria Musu Scott (wearing glasses) being escorted from the Criminal Court “A” to go back to the Monrovia Central Prison
By Garmah Never Lomo, garmahlomo@gmail.com
TEMPLE OF JUSTICE, Monrovia- The 12-member Jury of the Criminal Court “A” today, Thursday, December 21, 2023 brought down a majority guilty verdict for former Liberian Chief Justice Gloria Musu Scott and three other family members in the alleged murder of her daughter Charloe Musu.
Charloe was allegedly killed in February 2023 at the former Chief Justice residence in the Brewerville suburb of Monrovia, but Cllr. Scott and the three other pleaded not guilty to the commission of the crime. The 29-year- graduating senior at Starz University College in Monrovia was said to have been stabbed nine time on various parts of her body leading to her demise.
Eleven of the 12-member Jury, which serves as the trial of facts, said the defendants were guilty, while one of them said not guilt.
But the defense has taken exception to the guilty verdict.
Large crowd converged on the Criminal Court ‘A’ to witness the final legal arguments which preceded the handing down of the verdict.
The courtroom was jammed packed with members of the public, human rights organizations, magistrates from some magisterial courts, lawyers and also citizen journalists who were either to post what they observed in various manners.
Noticeable among the crowd were former Liberia Chief Justice Francis S. Korkpor, Mo Ali of the Unity Party, Senator Abraham Darius Dillon of Montserrado County, Senator Gbleh-bo Brown of Maryland County where the former Chief Justice hailed from, Judge Mardea Chenoweth of the 13th Judicial Circuit Court of Margibi County, Liberian National Bar Association President Sylvester Rennie, former Maryland county Senator John Ballout.
Each of the parties was allocated 1:30 minutes to argue their side of the case including law citations and said case commenced exactly 10:20am beginning with state prosecutors.
During the final argument, defense lawyers drew their theme from a book written by Liberian writer, Dr. Wilton Sankawulo titled, “It could be You too” that someone might like to put you in trouble.
Prosecution on the other hand charged the jurors to hold the defendants guilty of the crime charged because Armed robber will not enter in a home and only attacked and killed one person.
Closing Arguments in Charloe Musu’s Murder Trial Set for Thursday December 21,203 The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) and lawyers for former Chief Justice Gloria Musu Scott, Rebecca Youdeh, Alice Johnson and Gertrude Newton will on Wednesday make their closing arguments, bringing months of often-explosive testimony to an end, leaving the jurors to decide whether the defendants murder Charloe Musu.
The state indicated Cllr. Scott had her co-defendants for allegedly murdering Charloe Musu on the night of February 22,2023 in the homes of Cllr Scott, which they were charged with murder, criminal conspiracy and making false alams to law enforcement officers.
The trial jurors questioned Cllr Scott and her co-defendants’ involvement with the attacked at her residence that caused the death of Charloe Musu, with Scott testifying they have no knowledge of the crime.
Background
Tthe former Chief Justice said that it was an intruder that attacked her home with the intend to kill her and unfortunately, it was her daughter that was murdered. Scott, for her part, downplayed the accusations that she murdered her daughter, but argued that it was an intruder, who may have conspired with someone who has accessed to her home, to enter into her residence, with the intention to kill her. Several other persons to include Cllr Jerome Verdier, the former chairperson of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) accused the Monrovia City Major Jefferson Koijee of masterminding the attacked and murder of Charloe Musu through his operative and chief of patrol Varlee Telleh.
Cllr. Scott’s defense relied on the arguments that it was a male intruder who attacked the home and murder her daughter. In addition to substantive testimony about the alleged murder, the trial was also dominated by controversy over witnesses and pathologists, as Scott frequently attended the trial seated in the prison Dock, and accused the sta6e of falsely incriminating her to the murder.
Her testimony was supported by that of a pathologist Matthau Okoye, who said, the DNA samples obtained from the fingernails of Charloe Musu proved that it was that of a male and not a female as claimed by the prosecutors. in response, the government pathologist Benedict Kolee disqualified the Okoyer’s scientific findings, and had repeatedly argued that it was female who committed the murder.
The closing arguments in the trial took place today, Thursday December 21,2023 Once they’re over, Judge Roosevelt Z. Willie will instruct the jury to issue a verdict in the case, as the trial is a jury trial ‘meaning the jury will deliver the fact of the evidence before the verdict and the judge will decide the outcome.
Judge Willie will likely levy punishments against Cllr Scott and her co-defendants If the jury decides in favor of the state, with the prosecutors asking for a lengthy sentence. On the other hand, they are expected to similarly appeal any verdict the jury and judge may issue against them.
if the jury decides in her favor, she and her co-defendants will walk out of prison, because the state by the law cannot take an appeal against the jury verdict to the Supreme Court. The trial also included evidence showing how Charloe Musu was stabbed multiple times to death.
Monrovia City Major Jefferson Koijee and his co-subpeona persons to include Varlee Telleh, the GSM company, Telleh’s wife, Moses Wright, the private security assigned to Cllr Scott’s house before the murder and the police inspector General Patrick Sudue all testified to the case.
The defendants were represented by Former Associate Justice Kabineh J’aneh, Cllr. Jimmy S. Bombo, Cllr. Murphy Kanneh, Cllr. Cole Bengalu, Cllr. Findley Y. Kangar, Cllr. Dr. Mohammed Sheriff, Cllr. Amara Sheriff, Cllr. Augustine Fayiah, Atty. Dickson Tamba, Cllr. Richard Scott, Cllr. Kuku Dorbor, Atty Gbine Taylor Kelly of the Female lawyers Association of Liberia (AFELL), Atty. Facia Harris among others.
While the state was represented by Montserrado County Alhaji Swahilo Sesay, Cllr. Adolphus J. Kanuah, Cllr. Kutu Sumo Aquoi, Rudolph D.M.O. Johnson, Cllr. Bobby Livingstone among others.
Continuation of the final argument
One of defense lawyers, Cllr. Richard Scott said that the cutlass brought in as evidence by prosecution in which claimed was used to cut the steal from the window bar, has no bending mark on it but rather its new which the defense said it’s a blatant lie against the defendants meant to gain favor from the jurors.
In a heated argument, Cllr. Scott argued that prosecution didn’t proof their case beyond reasonable doubt because they didn’t carry the murder weapon in court to be shown to the jurors but rather they did. imagination.
Cllr. Scott added that prosecution witness and pathologist of Liberia Dr. Benedict Kolee instead of bringing scientific proof of his socalled DNA test report, he went ahead to be political as if he’s involved with the case.“Prosecution witness Dr. Kolee contradicted himself both during the general and rebuttal in a DNA report in which he said his DNA test report showed females instead of mixed DNA test but he Kolee claimed that it was minor issue but the foreign pathologist Dr. Mathias I. Okoye DNA analysis findings showed that a male DNA profile was found in the fingernail of the deceased Charloe Musu” Cllr. Scott explained.
The defense lawyers further questioned the jury who will invest in a child at age three up to 29 years and send to her to private university (Starz University of Technology) upon graduation and killed her?
Defense prayed court and jury to hand down a verdict of not guilty and set the defendants free of the crime alleged.
While state prosecution argued that defendants should be held guilty of the crimes based on circumstantial evidence and more besides they proof their case beyond reasonable doubt.
Prosecution Prayed court to take judicial notice of their legal memorandum in charging the jurors with the relevant laws cited.
They killed, they killed her ,prosecution lawyer told the jurors.
Meanwhile, Prosecution request court to take Judicial notice of section 25.2, 25.6, 25.4 of the Civil procedure law